Definition:
A mid-level project schedule that expands on the Level 1 Schedule by detailing major work streams, key project interfaces, and milestone dependencies across different disciplines.
Key Components:
- Expanded Work Breakdown Structure (WBS): Grouping major activities.
- Discipline-Level Breakdown: Engineering, procurement, and construction tasks.
- Major Interfaces & Dependencies: Coordinating cross-functional workstreams.
- Rolling Wave Planning: Progressive detailing as project definition improves.
Use Cases/Industries:
- Energy Infrastructure Projects: Coordinating high-voltage transmission system upgrades.
- Oil & Gas Production Facilities: Tracking engineering and procurement before offshore deployment.
- Refinery Modernization Projects: Managing integration between different units.
Advantages:
- Balances Detail & Readability: More specific than Level 1 while maintaining a broad perspective.
- Supports Multi-Team Coordination: Aligns engineers, procurement specialists, and contractors.
- Improves Risk Visibility: Identifies major sequencing risks across teams.
Challenges:
- Can Be Overly Simplified for Some Teams: Execution teams may require more detailed information.
- Requires Regular Updating: Changes in scope can shift dependencies.
Related Terms:
Interface Schedule, Summary Execution Plan, Project Alignment Schedule
Example:
A hydroelectric dam Level 2 schedule breaks down engineering, procurement, site preparation, dam wall construction, turbine installation, and electrical grid integration over five years.
Visited 1 times, 1 visit(s) today
Synonyms:
Project Summary Schedule, Mid-Level Schedule
